Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HNASX vs RGEBX
HNASX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts HNASX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
HNASX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HNASX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HNASX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. HNASX (428M). HNASX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . HNASX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: HNASX (25 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HNASX (0.82). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. HNASX (20.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNASX: RGEBX (250) vs HNASX (500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. HNASX (-6.19). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. HNASX (8.98).
| HNASX | RGEBX | HNASX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.08 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.08 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.190 | -1.057 | 491% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 428M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.19 | 1.80 | -344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.15 | 41.63 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.98 | 9.88 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 162.10 | 110.02 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers