Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMVFX vs JVMCX
HMVFX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HMVFX vs JVMCX
Hartford MidCap Value F
Price$16.17
Change-$0.14 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$28.50
Change-$0.19 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.75B
HMVFX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMVFX vs. JVMCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMVFX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. HMVFX (1.16B). HMVFX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HMVFX (0.97) vs JVMCX (0.00). HMVFX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HMVFX (9 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HMVFX (0.76). HMVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMVFX: JVMCX (1000) vs HMVFX (1000000). HMVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.18 vs. JVMCX (-3.40). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.02 vs. HMVFX (13.52).
| HMVFX | JVMCX | HMVFX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.85 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.359 | 13.399 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 24.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | -3.40 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.30 | 16.08 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.52 | 30.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement