Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMVAX vs JVMCX
HMVAX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts HMVAX vs JVMCX
Hartford MidCap Value A
Price$15.82
Change+$0.07 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$27.30
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.61B
HMVAX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMVAX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMVAX is a Buy and JVMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. HMVAX (1.15B). HMVAX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: HMVAX (0.69) vs JVMCX (0.00). HMVAX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: HMVAX (24 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than HMVAX (1.14). HMVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. JVMCX (47.00). JVMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMVAX: JVMCX (1000) vs HMVAX (2000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. HMVAX (-2.02). JVMCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.49 vs. HMVAX (35.80).
| HMVAX | JVMCX | HMVAX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.87 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.88 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.867 | 7.905 | 24% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 22.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | 1.79 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 20.12 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 55.49 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.14 | 35.64 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement