HMTC
Price
$5.49
Change
-$0.74 (-11.88%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
872K
SVCBF
Price
$13.35
Change
-$0.19 (-1.40%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
9.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMTC vs SVCBF

Header iconHMTC vs SVCBF Comparison
Open Charts HMTC vs SVCBFBanner chart's image
Homasote
Price$5.49
Change-$0.74 (-11.88%)
Volume$500
Capitalization872K
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.35
Change-$0.19 (-1.40%)
Volume$233
Capitalization9.32B
HMTC vs SVCBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMTC vs. SVCBF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMTC is a Hold and SVCBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HMTC: $5.49 vs. SVCBF: $13.35)
Brand notoriety: HMTC and SVCBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMTC: 460% vs. SVCBF: 55%
Market capitalization -- HMTC: $872K vs. SVCBF: $9.32B
HMTC [@Forest Products] is valued at $872K. SVCBF’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $9.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $9.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVCBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HMTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVCBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVCBF is a better buy in the long-term than HMTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMTC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVCBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMTC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVCBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HMTC and SVCBF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HMTC (@Forest Products) experienced а -11.88% price change this week, while SVCBF (@Forest Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.32%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-2.45% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVCBF($9.32B) has a higher market cap than HMTC($872K). HMTC YTD gains are higher at: 18.065 vs. SVCBF (8.939).
HMTCSVCBFHMTC / SVCBF
Capitalization872K9.32B0%
EBITDAN/A8.26B-
Gain YTD18.0658.939202%
P/E RatioN/A19.38-
RevenueN/A19.3B-
Total CashN/A222M-
Total DebtN/A12.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMTC vs SVCBF: Fundamental Ratings
HMTC
SVCBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
10086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVCBF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as HMTC (54). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew similarly to HMTC’s over the last 12 months.

SVCBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as HMTC (100). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew similarly to HMTC’s over the last 12 months.

SVCBF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HMTC (100). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew similarly to HMTC’s over the last 12 months.

HMTC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SVCBF (58). This means that HMTC’s stock grew similarly to SVCBF’s over the last 12 months.

SVCBF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as HMTC (98). This means that SVCBF’s stock grew similarly to HMTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMTCSVCBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVCBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MASK.X1.2393800.015650
+1.28%
Mask Network cryptocurrency
CRV.X0.5174760.006196
+1.21%
Curve DAO Token cryptocurrency
MOVR.X5.3803810.048649
+0.91%
Moonriver cryptocurrency
TRIBE.X0.404868-0.019179
-4.52%
Tribe cryptocurrency
ALPHA.X0.014489-0.000801
-5.24%
Stella cryptocurrency

HMTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMTC and BSTO have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMTC and BSTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMTC
1D Price
Change %
HMTC100%
-11.88%
BSTO - HMTC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCABY - HMTC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFSTF - HMTC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFPZF - HMTC
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
SSD - HMTC
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More

SVCBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVCBF and WFG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVCBF and WFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVCBF
1D Price
Change %
SVCBF100%
N/A
WFG - SVCBF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
IFSPF - SVCBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
WFSTF - SVCBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOR - SVCBF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMTC - SVCBF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-11.88%
More