Advertisement
HMTC vs SCABY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMTC is a Hold and SCABY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HMTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCABY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HMTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCABY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HMTC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCABY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HMTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SCABY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
HMTC (@Forest Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +3.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.86%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.55%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Forest Products (+3.89% weekly)Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).
@Pulp & Paper (+4.29% weekly)The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
| HMTC | SCABY | HMTC / SCABY | |
| Capitalization | 1.45M | 9.23B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 6.96B | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 22.76 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 20.7B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 626M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 515M | - |
HMTC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HMTC | SCABY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 17% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 40% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RYLD | 15.72 | 0.02 | +0.13% |
| Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | |||
| OPTZ | 37.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Optimize Strategy Index ETF | |||
| KOOL | 12.91 | -0.08 | -0.61% |
| North Shore Equity Rotation ETF | |||
| ACV | 27.23 | -0.24 | -0.87% |
| Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | |||
| MVLL | 19.48 | -0.89 | -4.36% |
| GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | |||
HMTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HMTC and SCABY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMTC and SCABY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMTC | 100% | N/A | ||
| SCABY - HMTC | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JCTC - HMTC | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.43% | ||
| WFG - HMTC | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
| CFPZF - HMTC | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.43% | ||
| STLJF - HMTC | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SCABY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCABY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCABY | 100% | N/A | ||
| HMTC - SCABY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WFG - SCABY | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
| IFSPF - SCABY | 4% Poorly correlated | +4.91% | ||
| SSD - SCABY | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| TCOR - SCABY | 1% Poorly correlated | -13.16% | ||
More | ||||