HMST
Price
$13.25
Change
+$0.06 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
283.81M
2 days until earnings call
PFS
Price
$19.04
Change
+$0.69 (+3.76%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
90 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMST vs PFS

Header iconHMST vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts HMST vs PFSBanner chart's image
HomeStreet
Price$13.25
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
Volume$25.88K
Capitalization283.81M
Provident Financial Services
Price$19.04
Change+$0.69 (+3.76%)
Volume$822.93K
Capitalization1.1B
HMST vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMST vs. PFS commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMST is a Hold and PFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HMST: $13.25 vs. PFS: $19.04)
Brand notoriety: HMST and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMST: 39% vs. PFS: 127%
Market capitalization -- HMST: $283.81M vs. PFS: $1.1B
HMST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $283.81M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HMST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFS is a better buy in the long-term than HMST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMST is a better buy in the short-term than PFS.

Price Growth

HMST (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.75% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMST is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($1.1B) has a higher market cap than HMST($284M). HMST has higher P/E ratio than PFS: HMST (37.15) vs PFS (8.49). HMST YTD gains are higher at: 16.025 vs. PFS (3.589). PFS has less debt than HMST: PFS (1.46B) vs HMST (1.97B). PFS has higher revenues than HMST: PFS (479M) vs HMST (179M).
HMSTPFSHMST / PFS
Capitalization284M1.1B26%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.0253.589447%
P/E Ratio37.158.49438%
Revenue179M479M37%
Total CashN/A189M-
Total Debt1.97B1.46B135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMST vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
HMST
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6812
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
9212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
270
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as HMST (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to HMST’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMST (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMST’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (12) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for HMST (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFS’s stock grew significantly faster than HMST’s over the last 12 months.

HMST's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HMST’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

HMST's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFS (70) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that HMST’s stock grew significantly faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMSTPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADOZX23.000.15
+0.66%
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
JGIRX92.370.40
+0.43%
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity R5
MDLVX29.770.12
+0.40%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val Inv A
FSEOX13.83N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq C
CIRRX18.06-0.02
-0.11%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities R

HMST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMST has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMST jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMST
1D Price
Change %
HMST100%
+0.45%
ALRS - HMST
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
CPF - HMST
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
CIVB - HMST
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.40%
EBC - HMST
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
PFS - HMST
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.76%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
+3.76%
BHLB - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
HOPE - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
N/A
FFBC - PFS
91%
Closely correlated
+4.28%
TCBK - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
ABCB - PFS
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More