Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs SMRPX
HMSIX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMRPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. HMSIX (74.2M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSIX (8.17) vs SMRPX (4.50). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). HMSIX (1.54) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). HMSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSIX (250000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.20 vs. HMSIX (-5.17). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 185.64 vs. SMRPX (143.30).
| HMSIX | SMRPX | HMSIX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.02 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.05 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.244 | 5.043 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.2M | 1.26B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.17 | 4.50 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.17 | 1.20 | -431% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.94 | 55.24 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 185.64 | 143.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement