Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs SMFPX
HMSIX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. HMSIX (76.2M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSIX (8.03) vs SMFPX (3.40). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSIX (1.54). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSIX (250000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.27 vs. HMSIX (11.40). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 202.58 vs. SMFPX (134.92).
| HMSIX | SMFPX | HMSIX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.15 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.303 | 2.599 | -89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.2M | 1.28B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.03 | 3.40 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.40 | 15.27 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.95 | 51.74 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 202.58 | 134.92 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.30 | 46.15 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement