Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs SMFPX
HMSIX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMFPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. HMSIX (73.9M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSIX (7.81) vs SMFPX (3.19). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSIX (1.54). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSIX (250000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. HMSIX (-0.85). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 191.76 vs. SMFPX (123.81).
| HMSIX | SMFPX | HMSIX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.15 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.667 | 8.213 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.9M | 1.29B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.81 | 3.19 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.85 | 6.78 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.12 | 66.05 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 191.76 | 123.81 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.22 | 182.43 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement