Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs RMLPX
HMSIX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. RMLPX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a StrongBuy and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. HMSIX (71.8M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: HMSIX (8.31) vs RMLPX (5.02). HMSIX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). HMSIX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). RMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: RMLPX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.11 vs. HMSIX (2.40). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 267.58 vs. HMSIX (233.55).
| HMSIX | RMLPX | HMSIX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.10 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.708 | 4.196 | -136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.8M | 1.16B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.31 | 5.02 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.40 | 3.11 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.44 | 59.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 233.55 | 267.58 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.18 | N/A | - |