Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SPNNX
HMSFX vs SPNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SPNNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a StrongBuy and SPNNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPNNX has more cash in the bank: 3.89B vs. HMSFX (73.6M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SPNNX: HMSFX (9.13) vs SPNNX (7.82). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SPNNX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SPNNX (6 years). SPNNX (9.27) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). SPNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). SPNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: SPNNX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). SPNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.40 vs. HMSFX (-0.51). SPNNX (220.56) and HMSFX (219.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HMSFX | SPNNX | HMSFX / SPNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 9.27 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 9.27 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.141 | 4.978 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.6M | 3.89B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.13 | 7.82 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.51 | 8.40 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.72 | 55.13 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.51 | 220.56 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement