Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMRPX
HMSFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. HMSFX (72.4M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSFX (8.89) vs SMRPX (4.54). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). HMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.82 vs. HMSFX (-6.91). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 158.02 vs. SMRPX (115.16).
| HMSFX | SMRPX | HMSFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.02 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.05 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.591 | 1.644 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.4M | 1.25B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.89 | 4.54 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.91 | -0.82 | 848% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.32 | 58.47 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 158.02 | 115.16 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.61 | 208.86 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement