Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMRPX
HMSFX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMRPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.22B vs. HMSFX (71.7M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSFX (8.77) vs SMRPX (4.43). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SMRPX (10 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). HMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSFX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. HMSFX (1.99). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 229.14 vs. SMRPX (174.76).
| HMSFX | SMRPX | HMSFX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.02 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.05 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.998 | 1.518 | -395% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.7M | 1.22B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.77 | 4.43 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 6.83 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.00 | 63.62 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 229.14 | 174.76 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement