Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMFPX
HMSFX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. HMSFX (77.1M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSFX (8.39) vs SMFPX (3.39). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.77 vs. HMSFX (12.67). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 219.94 vs. SMFPX (150.05).
| HMSFX | SMFPX | HMSFX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.12 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.007 | 1.709 | -117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.1M | 1.26B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.39 | 3.39 | 248% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.67 | 16.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.95 | 61.00 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.94 | 150.05 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.27 | 35.12 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement