Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMFPX
HMSFX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. HMSFX (72.4M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSFX (8.89) vs SMFPX (3.43). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.62 vs. HMSFX (-6.91). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 158.02 vs. SMFPX (104.47).
| HMSFX | SMFPX | HMSFX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.12 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.591 | 1.643 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.4M | 1.25B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.89 | 3.43 | 260% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.91 | -1.62 | 426% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.32 | 53.93 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 158.02 | 104.47 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.61 | 178.42 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement