Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs MLPOX
HMSFX vs MLPOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. MLPOX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Hold and MLPOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPOX has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. HMSFX (71.7M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than MLPOX: HMSFX (8.77) vs MLPOX (5.22). HMSFX was incepted earlier than MLPOX: HMSFX (12 years) vs MLPOX (16 years). MLPOX (6.38) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). MLPOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). MLPOX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: MLPOX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). MLPOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. HMSFX (1.99). MLPOX return over 5 years is better than : 257.70 vs. HMSFX (229.14).
| HMSFX | MLPOX | HMSFX / MLPOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 6.38 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 6.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.998 | -1.650 | 363% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.7M | 1.01B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.77 | 5.22 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 6.02 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.00 | 71.91 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 229.14 | 257.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.75 | 72.00 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement