HMRFF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.01 (-1.54%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.08M
MNSAF
Price
$2.61
Change
-$0.01 (-0.38%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
738.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMRFF vs MNSAF

Header iconHMRFF vs MNSAF Comparison
Open Charts HMRFF vs MNSAFBanner chart's image
HOMERUN RES
Price$0.64
Change-$0.01 (-1.54%)
Volume$41K
Capitalization40.08M
MINEROS SA
Price$2.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.38%)
Volume$10.45K
Capitalization738.01M
HMRFF vs MNSAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMRFF vs. MNSAF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMRFF is a Hold and MNSAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HMRFF: $0.64 vs. MNSAF: $2.61)
Brand notoriety: HMRFF and MNSAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMRFF: 143% vs. MNSAF: 87%
Market capitalization -- HMRFF: $40.08M vs. MNSAF: $738.01M
HMRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $40.08M. MNSAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $738.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNSAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HMRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNSAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the long-term than HMRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMRFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNSAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMRFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MNSAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSAF is a better buy in the short-term than HMRFF.

Price Growth

HMRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while MNSAF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSAF($738M) has a higher market cap than HMRFF($40.1M). MNSAF YTD gains are higher at: 149.435 vs. HMRFF (-27.861). MNSAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 209M vs. HMRFF (-4.35M). MNSAF has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. HMRFF (1.64M). HMRFF has less debt than MNSAF: HMRFF (87.7K) vs MNSAF (25.6M). MNSAF has higher revenues than HMRFF: MNSAF (634M) vs HMRFF (323).
HMRFFMNSAFHMRFF / MNSAF
Capitalization40.1M738M5%
EBITDA-4.35M209M-2%
Gain YTD-27.861149.435-19%
P/E RatioN/A5.92-
Revenue323634M0%
Total Cash1.64M110M1%
Total Debt87.7K25.6M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMRFF: Fundamental Ratings
HMRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMRFFMNSAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNSAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AASP6.00N/A
N/A
Agassi Sports Entertainment Corp.
FWONB95.00N/A
N/A
Liberty Media Corporation
BRTHY34.00N/A
N/A
Brother Industries Ltd.
HTCTF0.16N/A
N/A
Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.
IGLDF1.97N/A
N/A
Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd.

HMRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMRFF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMRFF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMRFF
1D Price
Change %
HMRFF100%
-1.16%
MNSAF - HMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
GAYMF - HMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.54%
KLKLF - HMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
TROYF - HMRFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
OPHRF - HMRFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+26.18%
More

MNSAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNSAF and ORFDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNSAF and ORFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSAF
1D Price
Change %
MNSAF100%
-0.53%
ORFDF - MNSAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
HMRFF - MNSAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
DC - MNSAF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
KSTBF - MNSAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIORF - MNSAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+16.57%
More