HMRFF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.01 (-1.54%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.08M
KLKLF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMRFF vs KLKLF

Header iconHMRFF vs KLKLF Comparison
Open Charts HMRFF vs KLKLFBanner chart's image
HOMERUN RES
Price$0.64
Change-$0.01 (-1.54%)
Volume$41K
Capitalization40.08M
KIRKLAND LAKE DISCOVERIES
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$247.52K
Capitalization15.56M
HMRFF vs KLKLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMRFF vs. KLKLF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMRFF is a Hold and KLKLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HMRFF: $0.64 vs. KLKLF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: HMRFF and KLKLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMRFF: 143% vs. KLKLF: 172%
Market capitalization -- HMRFF: $40.08M vs. KLKLF: $15.56M
HMRFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $40.08M. KLKLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMRFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKLKLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HMRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KLKLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KLKLF is a better buy in the long-term than HMRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMRFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLKLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMRFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KLKLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLKLF is a better buy in the short-term than HMRFF.

Price Growth

HMRFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while KLKLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMRFF($40.1M) has a higher market cap than KLKLF($15.6M). KLKLF YTD gains are higher at: 324.242 vs. HMRFF (-27.861). KLKLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.04M vs. HMRFF (-4.35M). KLKLF (1.7M) and HMRFF (1.64M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HMRFF has higher revenues than KLKLF: HMRFF (323) vs KLKLF (0).
HMRFFKLKLFHMRFF / KLKLF
Capitalization40.1M15.6M257%
EBITDA-4.35M-4.04M107%
Gain YTD-27.861324.242-9%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3230-
Total Cash1.64M1.7M96%
Total Debt87.7KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMRFF vs KLKLF: Fundamental Ratings
HMRFF
KLKLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5582
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KLKLF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMRFF (93). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

HMRFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLKLF (100). This means that HMRFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLKLF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HMRFF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to HMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMRFF (86). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

KLKLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HMRFF (100). This means that KLKLF’s stock grew similarly to HMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMRFFKLKLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AASP6.00N/A
N/A
Agassi Sports Entertainment Corp.
BRTHY34.00N/A
N/A
Brother Industries Ltd.
FWONB95.00N/A
N/A
Liberty Media Corporation
HTCTF0.16N/A
N/A
Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.
IGLDF1.97N/A
N/A
Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd.

HMRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMRFF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMRFF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMRFF
1D Price
Change %
HMRFF100%
-1.16%
MNSAF - HMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
GAYMF - HMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.54%
KLKLF - HMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
TROYF - HMRFF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
OPHRF - HMRFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+26.18%
More

KLKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KLKLF and MGMLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KLKLF and MGMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLKLF
1D Price
Change %
KLKLF100%
-3.45%
MGMLF - KLKLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
DTARF - KLKLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
HMRFF - KLKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
STLRF - KLKLF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
FDMIF - KLKLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More