HMN
Price
$40.64
Change
-$0.74 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
10 days until earnings call
PRA
Price
$23.80
Change
+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
650.38M
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs PRA

Header iconHMN vs PRA Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs PRABanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$40.64
Change-$0.74 (-1.79%)
Volume$313.65K
Capitalization1.49B
ProAssurance
Price$23.80
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Volume$326.84K
Capitalization650.38M
HMN vs PRA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. PRA commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a StrongBuy and PRA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $40.64 vs. PRA: $23.80)
Brand notoriety: HMN and PRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 116% vs. PRA: 59%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.49B vs. PRA: $650.38M
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.49B. PRA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $650.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HMN and PRA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PRA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRA is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.76% price change this week, while PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.24% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.5B) has a higher market cap than PRA($650M). PRA has higher P/E ratio than HMN: PRA (105.26) vs HMN (33.55). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 49.591 vs. HMN (5.327). PRA has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. HMN (552M). PRA has less debt than HMN: PRA (444M) vs HMN (546M). HMN has higher revenues than PRA: HMN (1.43B) vs PRA (1.13B).
HMNPRAHMN / PRA
Capitalization1.5B650M230%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.32749.59111%
P/E Ratio33.55105.2632%
Revenue1.43B1.13B127%
Total Cash552M3.8B15%
Total Debt546M444M123%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs PRA: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
PRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2244
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4656
SMR RATING
1..100
8790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8919
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (27) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew significantly faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (56) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's SMR Rating (87) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (90) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (55) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Specialty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for HMN (89) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew significantly faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNPRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCLIX61.530.88
+1.45%
Fidelity Advisor Industrials I
MNDKX33.160.16
+0.48%
MFS New Discovery R6
LCEVX18.990.08
+0.42%
Invesco Diversified Dividend C
FMXSX8.140.03
+0.37%
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index Svc
TGRYX12.46N/A
N/A
TCW Global Real Estate N

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been closely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
-1.79%
CINF - HMN
68%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
SAFT - HMN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
L - HMN
67%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
THG - HMN
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
CNA - HMN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
+0.13%
UFCS - PRA
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
SAFT - PRA
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
L - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
HMN - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
BNT - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More