HMN
Price
$43.59
Change
-$0.96 (-2.15%)
Updated
Dec 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.78B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$102.83
Change
-$1.66 (-1.59%)
Updated
Dec 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.25B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs L

Header iconHMN vs L Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs LBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$43.59
Change-$0.96 (-2.15%)
Volume$4.2K
Capitalization1.78B
Loews
Price$102.83
Change-$1.66 (-1.59%)
Volume$3.94K
Capitalization21.25B
HMN vs L Comparison Chart in %
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. L commentary
Dec 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $44.56 vs. L: $104.49)
Brand notoriety: HMN and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 94% vs. L: 121%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.81B vs. L: $21.59B
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.81B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $21.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than HMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.59% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($21.2B) has a higher market cap than HMN($1.78B). L has higher P/E ratio than HMN: L (14.90) vs HMN (11.05). L YTD gains are higher at: 23.637 vs. HMN (16.354). HMN has less debt than L: HMN (548M) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than HMN: L (17.8B) vs HMN (1.58B).
HMNLHMN / L
Capitalization1.78B21.2B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.35423.63769%
P/E Ratio11.0514.9074%
Revenue1.58B17.8B9%
Total CashN/A6.51B-
Total Debt548M8.95B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs L: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
376
SMR RATING
1..100
7896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5528
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5016

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (37) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's SMR Rating (78) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as L (96) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (55) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (81) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIDVX13.450.02
+0.15%
Janus Henderson U.S. Dividend Income I
TRSPX74.820.08
+0.11%
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Retire
VGOSX70.410.06
+0.09%
Voya Large-Cap Growth R6
USIFX33.610.02
+0.06%
Victory International
FMDCX16.40N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index Svc

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then THG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
-0.20%
THG - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CINF - HMN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ORI - HMN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
L - HMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
SAFT - HMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-1.19%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
CINF - L
83%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
TRV - L
80%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
ORI - L
79%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
More