HMN
Price
$44.52
Change
-$0.57 (-1.26%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
74 days until earnings call
L
Price
$95.00
Change
-$0.58 (-0.61%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.71B
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs L

Header iconHMN vs L Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs LBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$44.52
Change-$0.57 (-1.26%)
Volume$265.87K
Capitalization1.81B
Loews
Price$95.00
Change-$0.58 (-0.61%)
Volume$947.34K
Capitalization19.71B
HMN vs L Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. L commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $44.52 vs. L: $95.00)
Brand notoriety: HMN and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 102% vs. L: 113%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.81B vs. L: $19.71B
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.81B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $19.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HMN and L are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.66% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($19.7B) has a higher market cap than HMN($1.81B). L has higher P/E ratio than HMN: L (15.08) vs HMN (13.17). HMN YTD gains are higher at: 15.383 vs. L (12.335). HMN has less debt than L: HMN (547M) vs L (8.95B).
HMNLHMN / L
Capitalization1.81B19.7B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.38312.335125%
P/E Ratio13.1715.0887%
RevenueN/A17.5B-
Total CashN/A6.74B-
Total Debt547M8.95B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs L: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
437
SMR RATING
1..100
8497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4524
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8024
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for L (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (43) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's SMR Rating (84) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as L (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (45) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (80) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARYGX13.350.05
+0.38%
American Century Global Real Estate R5
FSGRX22.510.03
+0.13%
Franklin Small Cap Growth A
BULIX19.99-0.06
-0.30%
American Century Utilities Inv
LCCAX38.86-0.15
-0.38%
Columbia Contrarian Core A
LPEFX6.77-0.05
-0.73%
ALPS Global Opportunity Inv

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been closely correlated with ORI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then ORI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
-1.26%
ORI - HMN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
SAFT - HMN
67%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
CINF - HMN
66%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
L - HMN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
THG - HMN
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.61%
CNA - L
87%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
ORI - L
83%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More