HMN
Price
$43.59
Change
-$0.96 (-2.15%)
Updated
Dec 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.78B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KINS
Price
$14.79
Change
-$0.34 (-2.25%)
Updated
Dec 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
208.96M
96 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs KINS

Header iconHMN vs KINS Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs KINSBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$43.59
Change-$0.96 (-2.15%)
Volume$4.2K
Capitalization1.78B
Kingstone Companies
Price$14.79
Change-$0.34 (-2.25%)
Volume$800
Capitalization208.96M
HMN vs KINS Comparison Chart in %
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. KINS commentary
Dec 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and KINS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $44.56 vs. KINS: $15.13)
Brand notoriety: HMN and KINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 94% vs. KINS: 84%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.81B vs. KINS: $214.05M
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.81B. KINS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $214.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $133.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the long-term than HMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KINS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KINS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

KINS is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.59% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.78B) has a higher market cap than KINS($209M). HMN has higher P/E ratio than KINS: HMN (11.05) vs KINS (6.56). HMN YTD gains are higher at: 16.354 vs. KINS (0.267). KINS has less debt than HMN: KINS (5.06M) vs HMN (548M). HMN has higher revenues than KINS: HMN (1.58B) vs KINS (186M).
HMNKINSHMN / KINS
Capitalization1.78B209M849%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.3540.2676,132%
P/E Ratio11.056.56168%
Revenue1.58B186M851%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt548M5.06M10,828%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs KINS: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
KINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7026
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3741
SMR RATING
1..100
7823
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (63) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (78) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (57) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (92) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNKINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JIDVX13.450.02
+0.15%
Janus Henderson U.S. Dividend Income I
TRSPX74.820.08
+0.11%
Nuveen S&P 500 Index Retire
VGOSX70.410.06
+0.09%
Voya Large-Cap Growth R6
USIFX33.610.02
+0.06%
Victory International
FMDCX16.40N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index Svc

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been loosely correlated with THG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then THG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
-0.20%
THG - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
CINF - HMN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ORI - HMN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
L - HMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
SAFT - HMN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
More

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
+1.00%
SKWD - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
+5.18%
HMN - KINS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
PLMR - KINS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
CINF - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
L - KINS
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More