HMLN
Price
$192.00
Change
+$1.01 (+0.53%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
68.65M
LLAZF
Price
$69.95
Change
+$0.81 (+1.17%)
Updated
May 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.91B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMLN vs LLAZF

Header iconHMLN vs LLAZF Comparison
Open Charts HMLN vs LLAZFBanner chart's image
Hamlin Bank & Trust Co. (Smethport, PA)
Price$192.00
Change+$1.01 (+0.53%)
Volume$12
Capitalization68.65M
Liechtensteinische Landesbank Ag Vaduz
Price$69.95
Change+$0.81 (+1.17%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.91B
HMLN vs LLAZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMLN vs. LLAZF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMLN is a Buy and LLAZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HMLN: $192.00 vs. LLAZF: $69.95)
Brand notoriety: HMLN and LLAZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMLN: 25% vs. LLAZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HMLN: $68.65M vs. LLAZF: $2.91B
HMLN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $68.65M. LLAZF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLLAZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMLN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LLAZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LLAZF is a better buy in the long-term than HMLN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMLN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HMLN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HMLN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.53% price change this week, while LLAZF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LLAZF($2.91B) has a higher market cap than HMLN($68.6M). HMLN has higher P/E ratio than LLAZF: HMLN (12.36) vs LLAZF (11.17). HMLN YTD gains are higher at: 2.214 vs. LLAZF (0.000). HMLN has less debt than LLAZF: HMLN (14.2M) vs LLAZF (3.35B).
HMLNLLAZFHMLN / LLAZF
Capitalization68.6M2.91B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.2140.000-
P/E Ratio12.3611.17111%
RevenueN/A593M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.2M3.35B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMLN: Fundamental Ratings
HMLN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMLN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPTRX215.134.05
+1.92%
Baron Partners Retail
CESGX11.760.11
+0.94%
Coho Relative Value ESG
LVOLX18.440.15
+0.82%
SGI US Large Cap Equity A
PXEAX25.520.16
+0.63%
Impax Global Environmental Markets A
MAPOX114.430.64
+0.56%
Mairs & Power Balanced

HMLN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMLN has been loosely correlated with LLAZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMLN jumps, then LLAZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMLN
1D Price
Change %
HMLN100%
N/A
LLAZF - HMLN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTUY - HMLN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKHPF - HMLN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WSSH - HMLN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRARY - HMLN
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More

LLAZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LLAZF has been loosely correlated with HMLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LLAZF jumps, then HMLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LLAZF
1D Price
Change %
LLAZF100%
N/A
HMLN - LLAZF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCRDF - LLAZF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OAKV - LLAZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPKF - LLAZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNKB - LLAZF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More