HMDPF
Price
$116.67
Change
-$11.35 (-8.87%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VRT
Price
$168.80
Change
+$5.16 (+3.15%)
Updated
Nov 14, 04:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.57B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMDPF vs VRT

Header iconHMDPF vs VRT Comparison
Open Charts HMDPF vs VRTBanner chart's image
Hammond Power Solutions
Price$116.67
Change-$11.35 (-8.87%)
Volume$3.02K
Capitalization1.39B
Vertiv Holdings
Price$168.80
Change+$5.16 (+3.15%)
Volume$8.58K
Capitalization62.57B
HMDPF vs VRT Comparison Chart in %
HMDPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMDPF vs. VRT commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMDPF is a Hold and VRT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (HMDPF: $116.67 vs. VRT: $163.64)
Brand notoriety: HMDPF and VRT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMDPF: 97% vs. VRT: 148%
Market capitalization -- HMDPF: $1.39B vs. VRT: $62.57B
HMDPF [@Electrical Products] is valued at $1.39B. VRT’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $62.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $268.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $10.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMDPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HMDPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VRT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMDPF is a better buy in the long-term than VRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMDPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMDPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMDPF is a better buy in the short-term than VRT.

Price Growth

HMDPF (@Electrical Products) experienced а -12.78% price change this week, while VRT (@Electrical Products) price change was -10.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-1.73% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRT($62.6B) has a higher market cap than HMDPF($1.39B). VRT has higher P/E ratio than HMDPF: VRT (61.75) vs HMDPF (24.12). VRT YTD gains are higher at: 44.186 vs. HMDPF (31.178). VRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.6B vs. HMDPF (126M). VRT has more cash in the bank: 1.64B vs. HMDPF (27.9M). HMDPF has less debt than VRT: HMDPF (64.3M) vs VRT (3.18B). VRT has higher revenues than HMDPF: VRT (9.09B) vs HMDPF (826M).
HMDPFVRTHMDPF / VRT
Capitalization1.39B62.6B2%
EBITDA126M1.6B8%
Gain YTD31.17844.18671%
P/E Ratio24.1261.7539%
Revenue826M9.09B9%
Total Cash27.9M1.64B2%
Total Debt64.3M3.18B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMDPF vs VRT: Fundamental Ratings
HMDPF
VRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8761
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2731
SMR RATING
1..100
3527
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3475
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
552

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMDPF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as VRT (88). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew similarly to VRT’s over the last 12 months.

HMDPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as VRT (31). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew similarly to VRT’s over the last 12 months.

VRT's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as HMDPF (35). This means that VRT’s stock grew similarly to HMDPF’s over the last 12 months.

HMDPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as VRT (40). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew similarly to VRT’s over the last 12 months.

HMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRT (75). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMDPFVRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMDPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IIM12.560.03
+0.24%
INVESCO VALUE Municipal Income TRUST
XCNY28.25N/A
N/A
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
MAMB24.01-0.13
-0.54%
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF
BUFR33.59-0.24
-0.72%
FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF
HDG51.31-0.39
-0.75%
ProShares Hedge Replication

HMDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMDPF has been loosely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMDPF jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMDPF
1D Price
Change %
HMDPF100%
-8.87%
HUBB - HMDPF
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
NVT - HMDPF
37%
Loosely correlated
-4.97%
VRT - HMDPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
AEIS - HMDPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.69%
LGRDY - HMDPF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More

VRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRT has been closely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRT jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRT
1D Price
Change %
VRT100%
-5.61%
NVT - VRT
75%
Closely correlated
-4.97%
HUBB - VRT
67%
Closely correlated
-3.39%
POWL - VRT
64%
Loosely correlated
-7.87%
AEIS - VRT
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.69%
BE - VRT
48%
Loosely correlated
-18.28%
More