HLYK
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
18.26M
MFCSF
Price
$11.51
Change
+$0.21 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
164.47M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLYK vs MFCSF

Header iconHLYK vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts HLYK vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
HealthLynked
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$62.25K
Capitalization18.26M
Medical Facilities
Price$11.51
Change+$0.21 (+1.86%)
Volume$7.6K
Capitalization164.47M
HLYK vs MFCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLYK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLYK vs. MFCSF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLYK is a Hold and MFCSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HLYK: $0.02 vs. MFCSF: $11.51)
Brand notoriety: HLYK and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLYK: 67% vs. MFCSF: 341%
Market capitalization -- HLYK: $18.26M vs. MFCSF: $164.47M
HLYK [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $18.26M. MFCSF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $164.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLYK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HLYK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the long-term than HLYK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLYK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLYK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLYK is a better buy in the short-term than MFCSF.

Price Growth

HLYK (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.69% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFCSF($164M) has a higher market cap than HLYK($18.3M). MFCSF YTD gains are higher at: 6.975 vs. HLYK (-14.520). MFCSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 56M vs. HLYK (-7.37M). MFCSF has more cash in the bank: 35.3M vs. HLYK (68.7K). HLYK has less debt than MFCSF: HLYK (1.81M) vs MFCSF (139M). MFCSF has higher revenues than HLYK: MFCSF (433M) vs HLYK (6.08M).
HLYKMFCSFHLYK / MFCSF
Capitalization18.3M164M11%
EBITDA-7.37M56M-13%
Gain YTD-14.5206.975-208%
P/E RatioN/A23.87-
Revenue6.08M433M1%
Total Cash68.7K35.3M0%
Total Debt1.81M139M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLYK vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
HLYK
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9914
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10095
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCSF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLYK (95). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLYK’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLYK (100). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLYK’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLYK (99). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLYK’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as HLYK (65). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to HLYK’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HLYK (100). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to HLYK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLYKMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLYK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRMZ2.500.02
+0.81%
CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc.
AWAEF0.08N/A
N/A
SIIC Environment Holdings Ltd.
BLWYF35.78N/A
N/A
Bellway Plc.
LNNGF2.00N/A
N/A
Li Ning Co., Ltd.
PDRX2.41N/A
N/A
PD-RX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

HLYK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLYK and RAFLF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLYK and RAFLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLYK
1D Price
Change %
HLYK100%
N/A
RAFLF - HLYK
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWSCF - HLYK
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - HLYK
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
MFCSF - HLYK
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
KJFI - HLYK
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
+1.88%
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLYK - MFCSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - MFCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - MFCSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More