Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLSCX vs RWMFX
HLSCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HLSCX vs RWMFX
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC
Price$22.85
Change-$0.38 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.01B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
HLSCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLSCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLSCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. HLSCX (3.01B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HLSCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs HLSCX (0.04). HLSCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HLSCX (5 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HLSCX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. HLSCX (27.00). HLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HLSCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. HLSCX (-1.04). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. HLSCX (38.75).
| HLSCX | RWMFX | HLSCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.31 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.31 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.414 | 11.486 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.01B | 209B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.41 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | 5.30 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.98 | 32.83 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.75 | 47.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement