Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLSCX vs RWMFX
HLSCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HLSCX vs RWMFX
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC
Price$23.45
Change-$0.13 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.05B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.56
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
HLSCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLSCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLSCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. HLSCX (3.05B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HLSCX: RWMFX (1.47) vs HLSCX (0.04). HLSCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HLSCX (5 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HLSCX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. HLSCX (27.00). HLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HLSCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.01 vs. HLSCX (4.82). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.22 vs. HLSCX (35.74).
| HLSCX | RWMFX | HLSCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.31 | 352% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.31 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.296 | 2.164 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.05B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.47 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 10.01 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.10 | 31.75 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.74 | 40.22 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement