Ad is loading...
HLPPY
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
HNLGF
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
Ad is loading...

HLPPY vs HNLGF

Header iconHLPPY vs HNLGF Comparison
Open Charts HLPPY vs HNLGFBanner chart's image
Hang Lung Properties
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$15.67K
CapitalizationN/A
Hang Lung Group
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
HLPPY vs HNLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLPPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLPPY vs. HNLGF commentary
Nov 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLPPY is a Hold and HNLGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 24, 2024
Stock price -- (HLPPY: $4.03 vs. HNLGF: $1.10)
Brand notoriety: HLPPY and HNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLPPY: 44% vs. HNLGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HLPPY: $6.98B vs. HNLGF: $2.12B
HLPPY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $6.98B. HNLGF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLPPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HLPPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLPPY is a better buy in the long-term than HNLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLPPY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HLPPY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HLPPY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -1.23% price change this week, while HNLGF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.07% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLPPY($6.98B) has a higher market cap than HNLGF($2.12B). HLPPY has higher P/E ratio than HNLGF: HLPPY (11.82) vs HNLGF (5.79). HNLGF YTD gains are higher at: -22.310 vs. HLPPY (-36.589). HNLGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.03B vs. HLPPY (6.37B). HNLGF has higher revenues than HLPPY: HNLGF (11.2B) vs HLPPY (10.3B).
HLPPYHNLGFHLPPY / HNLGF
Capitalization6.98B2.12B329%
EBITDA6.37B7.03B91%
Gain YTD-36.589-22.310164%
P/E Ratio11.825.79204%
Revenue10.3B11.2B92%
Total CashN/A5.4B-
Total DebtN/A45.2B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLPPY vs HNLGF: Fundamental Ratings
HLPPY
HNLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5247
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9886
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6172
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4636
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLPPY's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNLGF (85). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HNLGF (100). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew similarly to HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HNLGF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPY (98). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew similarly to HLPPY’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPY's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as HNLGF (72). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew similarly to HNLGF’s over the last 12 months.

HNLGF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPY (46). This means that HNLGF’s stock grew similarly to HLPPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLPPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLPPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.450.88
+3.19%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X94339.4900001995.703100
+2.16%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL229.000.72
+0.32%
Apple
SPY590.500.20
+0.03%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA342.03-3.97
-1.15%
Tesla

HLPPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLPPY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLPPY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLPPY
1D Price
Change %
HLPPY100%
+0.75%
LGFRY - HLPPY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
CAOVY - HLPPY
61%
Loosely correlated
-5.42%
HLDCY - HLPPY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
HYSNY - HLPPY
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.50%
XIN - HLPPY
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
More

HNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNLGF and LSIHF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNLGF and LSIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNLGF
1D Price
Change %
HNLGF100%
N/A
LSIHF - HNLGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLDCY - HNLGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
HGPI - HNLGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLPPY - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
HLPPF - HNLGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More