HLPPF
Price
$1.03
Change
+$0.03 (+3.00%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.98B
SIOLY
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
458.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLPPF vs SIOLY

Header iconHLPPF vs SIOLY Comparison
Open Charts HLPPF vs SIOLYBanner chart's image
Hang Lung Properties
Price$1.03
Change+$0.03 (+3.00%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization6.98B
Sino-Ocean Group Holdings
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.35%)
Volume$234
Capitalization458.79M
HLPPF vs SIOLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIOLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLPPF vs. SIOLY commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLPPF is a Hold and SIOLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HLPPF: $1.03 vs. SIOLY: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: HLPPF and SIOLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLPPF: 145% vs. SIOLY: 1%
Market capitalization -- HLPPF: $6.98B vs. SIOLY: $458.79M
HLPPF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $6.98B. SIOLY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $458.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLPPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSIOLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HLPPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SIOLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLPPF is a better buy in the long-term than SIOLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLPPF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIOLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLPPF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SIOLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SIOLY is a better buy in the short-term than HLPPF.

Price Growth

HLPPF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIOLY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -3.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLPPF($6.98B) has a higher market cap than SIOLY($459M). HLPPF has higher P/E ratio than SIOLY: HLPPF (12.32) vs SIOLY (9.36). HLPPF YTD gains are higher at: 22.619 vs. SIOLY (-62.500). SIOLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.2B vs. HLPPF (6.49B). SIOLY has more cash in the bank: 15.4B vs. HLPPF (4.73B). HLPPF has less debt than SIOLY: HLPPF (44.7B) vs SIOLY (95.2B). SIOLY has higher revenues than HLPPF: SIOLY (67.1B) vs HLPPF (10.6B).
HLPPFSIOLYHLPPF / SIOLY
Capitalization6.98B459M1,521%
EBITDA6.49B10.2B64%
Gain YTD22.619-62.500-36%
P/E Ratio12.329.36132%
Revenue10.6B67.1B16%
Total Cash4.73B15.4B31%
Total Debt44.7B95.2B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLPPF vs SIOLY: Fundamental Ratings
HLPPF
SIOLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9982
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIOLY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (14). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SIOLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (100). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

SIOLY's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (99). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SIOLY (65). This means that HLPPF’s stock grew similarly to SIOLY’s over the last 12 months.

SIOLY's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as HLPPF (7). This means that SIOLY’s stock grew similarly to HLPPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLPPFSIOLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIOLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVLU30.210.23
+0.77%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Val ETF
MSD7.510.03
+0.40%
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund
PBJL28.770.05
+0.17%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jul
EWT59.430.04
+0.07%
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
FDT71.03N/A
N/A
First Trust Dev Mkts Ex-US AlphaDEX® ETF

HLPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLPPF has been loosely correlated with SOLLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLPPF jumps, then SOLLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLPPF
1D Price
Change %
HLPPF100%
N/A
SOLLY - HLPPF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AGPYY - HLPPF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
YUPRF - HLPPF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SIOLY - HLPPF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
CHVKF - HLPPF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

SIOLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIOLY has been loosely correlated with HLPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SIOLY jumps, then HLPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIOLY
1D Price
Change %
SIOLY100%
-1.96%
HLPPF - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SOLLY - SIOLY
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHVKY - SIOLY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHVKF - SIOLY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YUPRF - SIOLY
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More