Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFFX
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$37.45
Change-$0.19 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets581.04M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$72.80
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.01B
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFFX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. HLMVX (581M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: NPFFX (0.44) vs HLMVX (0.31). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). HLMVX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFFX (24.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.90 vs. HLMVX (-16.56). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.09 vs. HLMVX (-15.53).
| HLMVX | NPFFX | HLMVX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.78 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.78 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.505 | 18.182 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 581M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.44 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.56 | 10.90 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.42 | 66.32 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.53 | 34.09 | -46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.74 | 96.36 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement