Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFFX
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$37.25
Change+$0.27 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.75M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$71.62
Change+$0.33 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLMVX (579M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: NPFFX (0.45) vs HLMVX (0.31). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). HLMVX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFFX (24.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.65 vs. HLMVX (-11.08). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. HLMVX (-14.13).
| HLMVX | NPFFX | HLMVX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.78 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.78 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.914 | 16.266 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.45 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.08 | 17.65 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.72 | 42.69 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.13 | 37.08 | -38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.45 | 98.77 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers