Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFFX
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$36.66
Change+$0.19 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.01M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$69.57
Change+$0.39 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. HLMVX (570M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: NPFFX (0.46) vs HLMVX (0.31). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). HLMVX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFFX (24.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. HLMVX (-14.40). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.70 vs. HLMVX (-8.22).
| HLMVX | NPFFX | HLMVX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.78 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.78 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.174 | 12.938 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 156B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.46 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.40 | 11.19 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.03 | 46.16 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.22 | 45.70 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.23 | 86.51 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement