Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMVX vs NPFFX
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMVX vs NPFFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Inst
Price$35.62
Change-$0.51 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets555.08M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$66.93
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
HLMVX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMVX vs. NPFFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMVX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. HLMVX (555M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than HLMVX: NPFFX (0.49) vs HLMVX (0.32). HLMVX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: HLMVX (16 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). HLMVX (0.87) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.78). HLMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFFX (24.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMVX: NPFFX (250) vs HLMVX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.82 vs. HLMVX (-15.17). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.94 vs. HLMVX (-6.03).
| HLMVX | NPFFX | HLMVX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.78 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.78 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.105 | 8.653 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.49 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.17 | 8.82 | -172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.80 | 42.86 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.03 | 47.94 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.28 | 76.55 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement