Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMNX vs REEBX
HLMNX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts HLMNX vs REEBX
Harding Loevner International Eq I
Price$29.33
Change-$1.31 (-4.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$62.50
Change-$1.58 (-2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.63B
HLMNX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMNX vs. REEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMNX is a Buy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HLMNX (12.6B). REEBX pays higher dividends than HLMNX: REEBX (2.33) vs HLMNX (1.24). HLMNX was incepted earlier than REEBX: HLMNX (20 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than HLMNX (1.15). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HLMNX (25.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMNX: REEBX (250) vs HLMNX (5000). HLMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. REEBX (17.58). HLMNX return over 5 years is better than : 7.49 vs. REEBX (-6.27).
| HLMNX | REEBX | HLMNX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.856 | 5.610 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 135B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 2.33 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.68 | 17.58 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.55 | 23.60 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.49 | -6.27 | -119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.52 | 62.37 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers