Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMNX vs REEBX
HLMNX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts HLMNX vs REEBX
Harding Loevner International Eq I
Price$27.37
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.93B
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$59.27
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
HLMNX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMNX vs. REEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMNX is a Buy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. HLMNX (11.9B). HLMNX pays higher dividends than REEBX: HLMNX (1.38) vs REEBX (0.39). HLMNX was incepted earlier than REEBX: HLMNX (20 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than HLMNX (1.15). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HLMNX (22.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMNX: REEBX (250) vs HLMNX (5000). REEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. HLMNX (10.08). HLMNX return over 5 years is better than : 1.86 vs. REEBX (-9.12).
| HLMNX | REEBX | HLMNX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.27 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.161 | 12.360 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 134B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.39 | 352% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.08 | 11.26 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.03 | 25.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.86 | -9.12 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.53 | 34.24 | 206% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers