It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCWO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCWO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
HLMN (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -7.69% price change this week, while SCWO (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -12.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.
HLMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
SCWO is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
HLMN | SCWO | HLMN / SCWO | |
Capitalization | 2.08B | 167M | 1,244% |
EBITDA | 183M | -7M | -2,613% |
Gain YTD | 8.143 | -47.521 | -17% |
P/E Ratio | 104.17 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 1.48B | 1.65M | 89,292% |
Total Cash | 38.6M | 12.8M | 302% |
Total Debt | 836M | 478K | 174,895% |
SCWO | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLMN | SCWO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago87% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago89% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago70% | 18 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 5 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago74% | 4 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLMN has been loosely correlated with MIDD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLMN jumps, then MIDD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLMN | 100% | -0.40% | ||
MIDD - HLMN | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.51% | ||
GTLS - HLMN | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
ENOV - HLMN | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
RBC - HLMN | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
GTES - HLMN | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCWO has been loosely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCWO jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SCWO | 100% | +1.75% | ||
NPO - SCWO | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
HLMN - SCWO | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
EPAC - SCWO | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
WTS - SCWO | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
SXI - SCWO | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More |