Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$37.28
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.4M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$74.03
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HLMGX (580M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (0.70) vs HLMGX (0.14). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.09 vs. HLMGX (-15.47). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. HLMGX (-16.53).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.755 | 19.326 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.70 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.47 | 13.09 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.53 | 62.51 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.53 | 36.47 | -45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.36 | 100.70 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement