Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$31.47
Change-$6.33 (-16.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets558.58M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$71.69
Change-$2.65 (-3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Hold and RNPFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HLMGX (559M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (1.24) vs HLMGX (0.26). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPFX (24 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.45). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RNPFX (23.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. HLMGX (-7.87). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. HLMGX (-33.65).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.45 | 240% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.45 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.956 | 1.630 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.26 | 1.24 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.87 | 13.29 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.98 | 42.76 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.65 | 18.14 | -185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 131.36 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers