Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPFX
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPFX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$36.94
Change+$0.26 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.75M
American Funds New Perspective R5
Price$72.29
Change+$0.34 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
HLMGX vs RNPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLMGX (579M). RNPFX pays higher dividends than HLMGX: RNPFX (0.72) vs HLMGX (0.15). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPFX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPFX (23 years). HLMGX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RNPFX (0.46). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPFX (24.00). RNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPFX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.09 vs. HLMGX (-11.43). RNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.62 vs. HLMGX (-15.23).
| HLMGX | RNPFX | HLMGX / RNPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.46 | 235% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.745 | 16.522 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.72 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.43 | 18.09 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.82 | 43.66 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.23 | 38.62 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.47 | 101.31 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement