Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMGX vs RNPAX
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts HLMGX vs RNPAX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Advisor
Price$37.28
Change+$0.18 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets580.4M
American Funds New Perspective R1
Price$67.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.86B
HLMGX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLMGX vs. RNPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMGX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. HLMGX (580M). HLMGX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: HLMGX (0.14) vs RNPAX (0.00). HLMGX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: HLMGX (29 years) vs RNPAX (23 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than HLMGX (1.08). HLMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. RNPAX (24.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMGX: RNPAX (250) vs HLMGX (5000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. HLMGX (-15.47). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.26 vs. HLMGX (-16.53).
| HLMGX | RNPAX | HLMGX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.49 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.49 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.755 | 18.359 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.47 | 11.51 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.53 | 57.67 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.53 | 29.26 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.36 | 87.53 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement