Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MICHX
HLMCX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MICHX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.52
Change+$0.13 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.41M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$11.65
Change+$0.40 (+3.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.64M
HLMCX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 71.6M vs. HLMCX (3.41M). MICHX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MICHX (1.23) vs HLMCX (0.94). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MICHX: HLMCX (5 years) vs MICHX (8 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). MICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. HLMCX (31.00). HLMCX (100000) and MICHX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.20 vs. HLMCX (41.21).
| HLMCX | MICHX | HLMCX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.20 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.50 | 275% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.019 | 28.587 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.41M | 71.6M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.23 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.21 | 50.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.21 | 6.52 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -36.69 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |