Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.06
Change+$0.01 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.17M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.09
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.37M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 90.4M vs. HLMCX (3.17M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (3.26) vs HLMCX (1.07). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HLMCX (31.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.43 vs. HLMCX (32.38).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.32 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.340 | 21.796 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.17M | 90.4M | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 3.26 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.38 | 39.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.38 | 11.63 | -89% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -5.54 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement