Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.63
Change-$0.09 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.45M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. HLMCX (3.45M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (2.78) vs HLMCX (0.88). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HLMCX (31.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.74 vs. HLMCX (23.73).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.32 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.094 | 28.884 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.45M | 104M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 2.78 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.73 | 27.74 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.78 | 36.75 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -3.89 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement