HLI
Price
$205.79
Change
+$0.52 (+0.25%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.43B
27 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$114.61
Change
+$2.69 (+2.40%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.44B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLI vs SF

Header iconHLI vs SF Comparison
Open Charts HLI vs SFBanner chart's image
Houlihan Lokey
Price$205.79
Change+$0.52 (+0.25%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization14.43B
Stifel Financial
Price$114.61
Change+$2.69 (+2.40%)
Volume$11.59K
Capitalization11.44B
HLI vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLI vs. SF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLI is a StrongBuy and SF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HLI: $205.79 vs. SF: $114.61)
Brand notoriety: HLI and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLI: 17% vs. SF: 84%
Market capitalization -- HLI: $14.43B vs. SF: $11.44B
HLI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.43B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HLI and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HLI and SF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.92% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLI($14.4B) has a higher market cap than SF($11.4B). HLI has higher P/E ratio than SF: HLI (34.56) vs SF (21.69). HLI YTD gains are higher at: 19.360 vs. SF (9.480). HLI has less debt than SF: HLI (440M) vs SF (1.55B). SF has higher revenues than HLI: SF (5.06B) vs HLI (2.48B).
HLISFHLI / SF
Capitalization14.4B11.4B126%
EBITDA623MN/A-
Gain YTD19.3609.480204%
P/E Ratio34.5621.69159%
Revenue2.48B5.06B49%
Total Cash837MN/A-
Total Debt440M1.55B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLI vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
HLI
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1062
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
822
SMR RATING
1..100
4512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4836
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLI's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (33). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (22). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLI (45). This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as SF (49). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (48). This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLISF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHN10.130.01
+0.05%
Blackrock Muniholdings NEW York Quality Fund
VICE34.93N/A
N/A
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
ETV14.07-0.07
-0.47%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
EAI21.49-0.12
-0.57%
Entergy Arkansas LLC
EMC30.69-0.29
-0.93%
Global X Emerging Mkts Great Cnsmr ETF

HLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLI has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLI jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLI
1D Price
Change %
HLI100%
-0.15%
MC - HLI
84%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
EVR - HLI
83%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
LAZ - HLI
82%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
SF - HLI
81%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
PJT - HLI
81%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
+2.40%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
EVR - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
More