HLI
Price
$205.97
Change
+$0.70 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.48B
25 days until earnings call
MC
Price
$72.40
Change
+$0.64 (+0.89%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.37B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLI vs MC

Header iconHLI vs MC Comparison
Open Charts HLI vs MCBanner chart's image
Houlihan Lokey
Price$205.97
Change+$0.70 (+0.34%)
Volume$262.19K
Capitalization14.48B
Moelis & Company
Price$72.40
Change+$0.64 (+0.89%)
Volume$661.03K
Capitalization5.37B
HLI vs MC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLI vs. MC commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLI is a StrongBuy and MC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HLI: $205.97 vs. MC: $72.40)
Brand notoriety: HLI and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLI: 64% vs. MC: 94%
Market capitalization -- HLI: $14.48B vs. MC: $5.37B
HLI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $14.48B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLI is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

MC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLI($14.5B) has a higher market cap than MC($5.37B). HLI has higher P/E ratio than MC: HLI (34.68) vs MC (28.28). HLI YTD gains are higher at: 19.767 vs. MC (0.987). HLI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 623M vs. MC (256M). HLI has more cash in the bank: 837M vs. MC (222M). MC has less debt than HLI: MC (219M) vs HLI (440M). HLI has higher revenues than MC: HLI (2.48B) vs MC (1.38B).
HLIMCHLI / MC
Capitalization14.5B5.37B270%
EBITDA623M256M243%
Gain YTD19.7670.9872,003%
P/E Ratio34.6828.28123%
Revenue2.48B1.38B179%
Total Cash837M222M377%
Total Debt440M219M201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLI vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
HLI
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1759
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
831
SMR RATING
1..100
4521
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (30). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (31). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's SMR Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (45). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (48). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (100). This means that HLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLIMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLSP26.350.16
+0.61%
Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
SEPT34.340.19
+0.57%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF
LOPP32.63N/A
N/A
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
PTY14.42-0.03
-0.21%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
BRKD23.03-0.19
-0.80%
Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X Shares

HLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLI has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLI jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLI
1D Price
Change %
HLI100%
+0.34%
MC - HLI
84%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
EVR - HLI
84%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
LAZ - HLI
82%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
PJT - HLI
81%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
SF - HLI
81%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
More

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
+0.89%
EVR - MC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
LAZ - MC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
PWP - MC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
HLI - MC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
SF - MC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.45%
More