HLI
Price
$173.97
Change
+$1.23 (+0.71%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
MC
Price
$73.81
Change
+$2.09 (+2.91%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HLI vs MC

Header iconHLI vs MC Comparison
Open Charts HLI vs MCBanner chart's image
Houlihan Lokey
Price$173.97
Change+$1.23 (+0.71%)
Volume$1.38M
CapitalizationN/A
Moelis & Company
Price$73.81
Change+$2.09 (+2.91%)
Volume$1.26M
CapitalizationN/A
HLI vs MC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLI vs. MC commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLI is a Hold and MC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (HLI: $173.97 vs. MC: $73.81)
Brand notoriety: HLI and MC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLI: 395% vs. MC: 196%
Market capitalization -- HLI: $8.86B vs. MC: $3.79B
HLI [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $8.86B. MC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HLI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the long-term than MC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLI is a better buy in the short-term than MC.

Price Growth

HLI (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while MC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLI is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

MC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLI($8.86B) has a higher market cap than MC($3.79B). MC has higher P/E ratio than HLI: MC (82.58) vs HLI (32.95). HLI YTD gains are higher at: 47.300 vs. MC (37.006). HLI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 377M vs. MC (-32.04M). HLI has more cash in the bank: 561M vs. MC (186M). MC has less debt than HLI: MC (216M) vs HLI (420M). HLI has higher revenues than MC: HLI (1.84B) vs MC (855M).
HLIMCHLI / MC
Capitalization8.86B3.79B234%
EBITDA377M-32.04M-1,177%
Gain YTD47.30037.006128%
P/E Ratio32.9582.5840%
Revenue1.84B855M215%
Total Cash561M186M302%
Total Debt420M216M194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLI vs MC: Fundamental Ratings
HLI
MC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8215
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
520
SMR RATING
1..100
5667
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MC's Valuation (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (35). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (20). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's SMR Rating (56) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as MC (67). This means that HLI’s stock grew similarly to MC’s over the last 12 months.

MC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HLI (43). This means that MC’s stock grew similarly to HLI’s over the last 12 months.

HLI's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MC (98). This means that HLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLIMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

HLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLI has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLI jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLI
1D Price
Change %
HLI100%
+0.71%
PIPR - HLI
77%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
PJT - HLI
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
EVR - HLI
76%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
MC - HLI
75%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
SF - HLI
68%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
More

MC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MC has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MC jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MC
1D Price
Change %
MC100%
+2.91%
PIPR - MC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
EVR - MC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
PJT - MC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
LAZ - MC
75%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
HLI - MC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More