Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$36.86
Change+$0.09 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.28M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$66.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. HLGZX (573M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.46) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (24 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.50 vs. HLGZX (-13.92). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. HLGZX (-13.43).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.700 | 14.870 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 573M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.92 | 12.50 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.38 | 31.65 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.43 | 32.83 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement