Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLGZX vs NPFCX
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison
Open Charts HLGZX vs NPFCX
Harding Loevner Global Equity Instl Z
Price$37.75
Change-$0.50 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets576.92M
American Funds New Perspective C
Price$68.59
Change-$1.15 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.22B
HLGZX vs NPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLGZX vs. NPFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLGZX is a Buy and NPFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFCX has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. HLGZX (577M). HLGZX pays higher dividends than NPFCX: HLGZX (0.45) vs NPFCX (0.00). HLGZX was incepted earlier than NPFCX: HLGZX (8 years) vs NPFCX (25 years). NPFCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than HLGZX (0.77). HLGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NPFCX (24.00). NPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLGZX: NPFCX (250) vs HLGZX (10000000). NPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. HLGZX (-14.38). NPFCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.64 vs. HLGZX (-16.11).
| HLGZX | NPFCX | HLGZX / NPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.48 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.48 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.799 | 20.449 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 577M | 165B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.38 | 13.49 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.88 | 47.67 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.11 | 28.64 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement