Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFZX vs RNWBX
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFZX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg MktsInstZ
Price$9.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.48M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.67
Change-$0.40 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.79B
HLFZX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFZX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFZX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.8B vs. HLFZX (138M). HLFZX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFZX (1.80) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFZX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFZX (8 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFZX (1.35). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFZX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFZX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFZX (2500000). RNWBX (14.84) and HLFZX (14.31) have marching annual gain over last year. HLFZX return over 5 years is better than : 48.77 vs. RNWBX (24.82).
| HLFZX | RNWBX | HLFZX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.358 | 16.479 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 250 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138M | 70.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.13 | 1,409% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.31 | 14.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.71 | 37.52 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.77 | 24.82 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers