HLFN
Price
$34.52
Change
+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
48.56M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NWG
Price
$16.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
66.41B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLFN vs NWG

Header iconHLFN vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts HLFN vs NWGBanner chart's image
Home Loan Financial
Price$34.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Volume$300
Capitalization48.56M
NatWest Group
Price$16.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.64K
Capitalization66.41B
HLFN vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
HLFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLFN vs. NWG commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFN is a Hold and NWG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (HLFN: $34.52 vs. NWG: $16.67)
Brand notoriety: HLFN and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLFN: 42% vs. NWG: 84%
Market capitalization -- HLFN: $48.56M vs. NWG: $66.41B
HLFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $48.56M. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HLFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than HLFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both HLFN and NWG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

HLFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($66.4B) has a higher market cap than HLFN($48.6M). NWG has higher P/E ratio than HLFN: NWG (9.70) vs HLFN (6.51). NWG YTD gains are higher at: 72.690 vs. HLFN (14.231). HLFN has less debt than NWG: HLFN (30M) vs NWG (70B). NWG has higher revenues than HLFN: NWG (15.5B) vs HLFN (17.6M).
HLFNNWGHLFN / NWG
Capitalization48.6M66.4B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.23172.69020%
P/E Ratio6.519.7067%
Revenue17.6M15.5B0%
Total Cash3.66MN/A-
Total Debt30M70B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLFN vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
HLFN
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9122
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
153
SMR RATING
1..100
465
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLFN's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NWG (84) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HLFN’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HLFN (15) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFN (46) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HLFN (49) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFN (64) in the null industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLFNNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EES57.140.85
+1.51%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Earnings ETF
MHF6.970.05
+0.72%
Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund
DSPY58.300.30
+0.51%
Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF
IJK96.840.38
+0.39%
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
XNOV37.660.05
+0.14%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Nov

HLFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFN and CIBN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFN and CIBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFN
1D Price
Change %
HLFN100%
N/A
CIBN - HLFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HLFN
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
KEY - HLFN
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
HVLM - HLFN
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBK - HLFN
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
-1.42%
LYG - NWG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
DB - NWG
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More