HLFN
Price
$34.52
Change
+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 2 closing price
Capitalization
48.56M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HVLM
Price
$29.40
Change
+$0.40 (+1.38%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Capitalization
25.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLFN vs HVLM

Header iconHLFN vs HVLM Comparison
Open Charts HLFN vs HVLMBanner chart's image
Home Loan Financial
Price$34.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
Volume$300
Capitalization48.56M
Huron Valley Ban
Price$29.40
Change+$0.40 (+1.38%)
Volume$200
Capitalization25.8M
HLFN vs HVLM Comparison Chart in %
HLFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HVLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLFN vs. HVLM commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFN is a Hold and HVLM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HLFN: $34.49 vs. HVLM: $29.40)
Brand notoriety: HLFN and HVLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLFN: 49% vs. HVLM: 21%
Market capitalization -- HLFN: $48.56M vs. HVLM: $25.8M
HLFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $48.56M. HVLM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $25.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHVLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HLFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HVLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLFN is a better buy in the long-term than HVLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HVLM’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HVLM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLFN is a better buy in the short-term than HVLM.

Price Growth

HLFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.44% price change this week, while HVLM (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLFN($48.6M) has a higher market cap than HVLM($25.8M). HVLM has higher P/E ratio than HLFN: HVLM (9.25) vs HLFN (6.51). HLFN YTD gains are higher at: 14.124 vs. HVLM (10.526).
HLFNHVLMHLFN / HVLM
Capitalization48.6M25.8M188%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.12410.526134%
P/E Ratio6.519.2570%
Revenue17.6MN/A-
Total Cash3.66MN/A-
Total Debt30MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLFN vs HVLM: Fundamental Ratings
HLFN
HVLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17100
SMR RATING
1..100
46100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6468
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HVLM's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFN (55). This means that HVLM’s stock grew similarly to HLFN’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HVLM (100). This means that HLFN’s stock grew significantly faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVLM (100). This means that HLFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HVLM (51). This means that HLFN’s stock grew similarly to HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

HLFN's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as HVLM (68). This means that HLFN’s stock grew similarly to HVLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLFNHVLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
9%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
23%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
22%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HVLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOUYF48.49N/A
N/A
Bouygues SA
NRTZF11.47N/A
N/A
Noritz Corp.
KELRF8.03N/A
N/A
Keisei Electric Rail
CJAX3.55N/A
N/A
COJAX OIL & GAS CORP.
BRWC0.45N/A
N/A
BIRDIE WIN CORP.

HLFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFN and CIBN have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFN and CIBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFN
1D Price
Change %
HLFN100%
N/A
CIBN - HLFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWG - HLFN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
KEY - HLFN
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
HVLM - HLFN
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFBK - HLFN
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HVLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HVLM and WRIV have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVLM and WRIV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HVLM
1D Price
Change %
HVLM100%
N/A
WRIV - HVLM
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QNBC - HVLM
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLFN - HVLM
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - HVLM
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRBK - HVLM
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More