Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFMX vs RNWBX
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst
Price$8.40
Change-$0.09 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.97M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.86
Change-$1.00 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74B
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.7B vs. HLFMX (132M). HLFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFMX (1.80) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFMX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFMX (1.46). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFMX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFMX (500000). HLFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.20 vs. RNWBX (7.09). HLFMX return over 5 years is better than : 37.14 vs. RNWBX (28.56).
| HLFMX | RNWBX | HLFMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.67 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.67 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.332 | 11.298 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 67.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.13 | 1,337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.20 | 7.09 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.37 | 32.44 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.14 | 28.56 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.26 | 54.60 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement