Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFMX vs RNWBX
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst
Price$9.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets141.13M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.97
Change+$0.63 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.9B
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.9B vs. HLFMX (141M). HLFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFMX (1.63) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFMX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFMX (1.41). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFMX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFMX (500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.06 vs. HLFMX (12.20). HLFMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.19 vs. RNWBX (21.44).
| HLFMX | RNWBX | HLFMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.67 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.67 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.550 | 18.246 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 71.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.13 | 1,302% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.20 | 14.06 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.66 | 40.53 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.19 | 21.44 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.22 | 84.15 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement