Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFMX vs RNWBX
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst
Price$9.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.39M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.17
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.17B
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFMX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. HLFMX (132M). HLFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFMX (1.63) vs RNWBX (0.12). HLFMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFMX (18 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFMX (1.41). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFMX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFMX (500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.78 vs. HLFMX (14.34). HLFMX return over 5 years is better than : 24.51 vs. RNWBX (14.40).
| HLFMX | RNWBX | HLFMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.67 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.67 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.918 | 24.772 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.12 | 1,384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.34 | 18.78 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.32 | 40.66 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.51 | 14.40 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.12 | 87.08 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement