Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFMX vs RNWBX
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst
Price$8.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.84M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.27
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. HLFMX (134M). HLFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFMX (1.73) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFMX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFMX (1.46). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFMX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFMX (500000). HLFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. RNWBX (10.50). HLFMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.67 vs. RNWBX (27.64).
| HLFMX | RNWBX | HLFMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.67 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.67 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.355 | 15.935 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.13 | 1,353% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.42 | 10.50 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.35 | 37.23 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.67 | 27.64 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.21 | 63.65 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers