HLFDY
Price
$4.50
Change
+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
622.42M
IHCPF
Price
$9.16
Change
-$0.25 (-2.66%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
3.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLFDY vs IHCPF

Header iconHLFDY vs IHCPF Comparison
Open Charts HLFDY vs IHCPFBanner chart's image
Halfords Group
Price$4.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.22%)
Volume$100
Capitalization622.42M
Inchcape
Price$9.16
Change-$0.25 (-2.66%)
Volume$726
Capitalization3.76B
HLFDY vs IHCPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLFDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLFDY vs. IHCPF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFDY is a Hold and IHCPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (HLFDY: $4.50 vs. IHCPF: $9.16)
Brand notoriety: HLFDY and IHCPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLFDY: 23% vs. IHCPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- HLFDY: $622.42M vs. IHCPF: $3.76B
HLFDY [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $622.42M. IHCPF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLFDY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIHCPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLFDY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IHCPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLFDY is a better buy in the long-term than IHCPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLFDY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HLFDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HLFDY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -2.17% price change this week, while IHCPF (@Specialty Stores) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IHCPF($3.76B) has a higher market cap than HLFDY($622M). HLFDY has higher P/E ratio than IHCPF: HLFDY (15.17) vs IHCPF (10.51). HLFDY YTD gains are higher at: 42.857 vs. IHCPF (-2.726). IHCPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 772M vs. HLFDY (182M). IHCPF has more cash in the bank: 689M vs. HLFDY (63.6M). HLFDY has less debt than IHCPF: HLFDY (414M) vs IHCPF (1.73B). IHCPF has higher revenues than HLFDY: IHCPF (11.4B) vs HLFDY (1.44B).
HLFDYIHCPFHLFDY / IHCPF
Capitalization622M3.76B17%
EBITDA182M772M24%
Gain YTD42.857-2.726-1,572%
P/E Ratio15.1710.51144%
Revenue1.44B11.4B13%
Total Cash63.6M689M9%
Total Debt414M1.73B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLFDY vs IHCPF: Fundamental Ratings
HLFDY
IHCPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
8989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4173
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1575
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLFDY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as IHCPF (9). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew similarly to IHCPF’s over the last 12 months.

IHCPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFDY (100). This means that IHCPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFDY’s over the last 12 months.

IHCPF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFDY (89). This means that IHCPF’s stock grew similarly to HLFDY’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as IHCPF (73). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew similarly to IHCPF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFDY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IHCPF (75). This means that HLFDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IHCPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLFDYIHCPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLFDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEF5.900.05
+0.85%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.
TSLS7.690.06
+0.79%
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
NUSC40.810.14
+0.34%
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
EAOM28.77N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Aware 40/60 Mod Allc ETF
ABNY11.50-0.03
-0.26%
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF

HLFDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFDY and CYYHF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFDY and CYYHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFDY
1D Price
Change %
HLFDY100%
N/A
CYYHF - HLFDY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHCPF - HLFDY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNLMY - HLFDY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPGNF - HLFDY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZASF - HLFDY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IHCPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHCPF has been loosely correlated with ZHSHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHCPF jumps, then ZHSHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHCPF
1D Price
Change %
IHCPF100%
N/A
ZHSHF - IHCPF
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNED - IHCPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NAAS - IHCPF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
CASY - IHCPF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
KGFHY - IHCPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More