Advertisement
HLF vs MAMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLF is a Hold and MAMA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HLF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +4.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.76%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.
MAMA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+1.51% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| HLF | MAMA | HLF / MAMA | |
| Capitalization | 1.75B | 628M | 278% |
| EBITDA | 618M | 9.98M | 6,190% |
| Gain YTD | 31.265 | 14.529 | 215% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.41 | 128.69 | 4% |
| Revenue | 4.96B | 151M | 3,286% |
| Total Cash | 306M | 18.1M | 1,691% |
| Total Debt | 2.21B | 16M | 13,825% |
HLF | MAMA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLF's Valuation (61) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as MAMA (91) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (6) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (60) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as MAMA (37) in the null industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.
MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (69) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
| HLF | MAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 16 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 9 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 4 days ago 85% |
Advertisement
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| MAMA - HLF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| THS - HLF | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| FRPT - HLF | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| BGS - HLF | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.57% | ||
More | ||||
MAMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAMA has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAMA jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MAMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAMA | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| JBSS - MAMA | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| NATR - MAMA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| HLF - MAMA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| FRPT - MAMA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| DAR - MAMA | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||