Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWBX
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$41.98
Change+$0.11 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets435.96M
American Funds New World R2
Price$86.59
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41B
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 71.4B vs. HLEMX (436M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLEMX (1.44) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLEMX (1.14). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. HLEMX (4.35). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. HLEMX (-20.95).
| HLEMX | RNWBX | HLEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.034 | 17.729 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 436M | 71.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.13 | 1,118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.35 | 12.87 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.25 | 30.09 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.95 | 22.93 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.71 | 72.17 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers