It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLBBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
HLBBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -9.63% price change this week, while HLN (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
HLN is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
HLBBF | HLN | HLBBF / HLN | |
Capitalization | 4.85B | 38.4B | 13% |
EBITDA | 2.94B | 2.35B | 125% |
Gain YTD | 27.083 | 15.145 | 179% |
P/E Ratio | 13.25 | 29.23 | 45% |
Revenue | 18.9B | 11.3B | 167% |
Total Cash | 2.88B | 994M | 290% |
Total Debt | 5.22B | 9.46B | 55% |
HLN | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago44% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLBBF has been loosely correlated with DRRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLBBF jumps, then DRRX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLBBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLBBF | 100% | N/A | ||
DRRX - HLBBF | 38% Loosely correlated | -7.44% | ||
BNXTF - HLBBF | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HLUBF - HLBBF | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HLNCF - HLBBF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
HLN - HLBBF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HLN and ZTS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLN and ZTS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLN | 100% | +0.87% | ||
ZTS - HLN | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
BHC - HLN | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
ANIP - HLN | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
VTRS - HLN | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
COLL - HLN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
More |