HKXCY
Price
$55.94
Change
+$0.37 (+0.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
70.57B
45 days until earnings call
TIGR
Price
$12.29
Change
-$0.43 (-3.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.18B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCY vs TIGR

Header iconHKXCY vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts HKXCY vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$55.94
Change+$0.37 (+0.67%)
Volume$62.74K
Capitalization70.57B
UP Fintech Holding
Price$12.29
Change-$0.43 (-3.38%)
Volume$5.89M
Capitalization2.18B
HKXCY vs TIGR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCY vs. TIGR commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCY is a Hold and TIGR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCY: $55.94 vs. TIGR: $12.29)
Brand notoriety: HKXCY and TIGR are both not notable
HKXCY represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while TIGR is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCY: 91% vs. TIGR: 92%
Market capitalization -- HKXCY: $70.57B vs. TIGR: $2.18B
HKXCY [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $70.57B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TIGR is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCY.

Price Growth

HKXCY (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -3.22% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.40% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($70.6B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($2.18B). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: HKXCY (35.83) vs TIGR (18.62). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 90.248 vs. HKXCY (53.158).
HKXCYTIGRHKXCY / TIGR
Capitalization70.6B2.18B3,233%
EBITDAN/A174M-
Gain YTD53.15890.24859%
P/E Ratio35.8318.62192%
RevenueN/A435M-
Total CashN/A582M-
Total DebtN/A172M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCY vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCY
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7283
SMR RATING
1..100
3559
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCY's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (78) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (59) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (42) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (93) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCYTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHXPX15.760.19
+1.22%
American Beacon Shapiro Equity Opps Inv
RGLHX26.99N/A
N/A
American Funds Global Insight R-2E
SEVSX43.50-0.04
-0.09%
NAA SMid Cap Value C
USAUX76.06-0.08
-0.11%
Victory Aggressive Growth
PDSIX48.85-0.15
-0.31%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index I

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
+0.67%
FUTU - HKXCY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
TIGR - HKXCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
HKXCF - HKXCY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOP - HKXCY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SF - HKXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
-3.38%
FUTU - TIGR
71%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
HKXCY - TIGR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
TOP - TIGR
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
HKXCF - TIGR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IREN - TIGR
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More