HKXCY
Price
$55.94
Change
+$0.37 (+0.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
70.57B
45 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$112.58
Change
-$3.13 (-2.71%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.5B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCY vs SF

Header iconHKXCY vs SF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCY vs SFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$55.94
Change+$0.37 (+0.67%)
Volume$62.74K
Capitalization70.57B
Stifel Financial
Price$112.58
Change-$3.13 (-2.71%)
Volume$736.18K
Capitalization11.5B
HKXCY vs SF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCY vs. SF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCY is a Hold and SF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCY: $55.94 vs. SF: $112.58)
Brand notoriety: HKXCY and SF are both not notable
HKXCY represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while SF is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCY: 91% vs. SF: 102%
Market capitalization -- HKXCY: $70.57B vs. SF: $11.5B
HKXCY [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $70.57B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the long-term than HKXCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCY.

Price Growth

HKXCY (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -3.22% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.40% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($70.6B) has a higher market cap than SF($11.5B). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than SF: HKXCY (35.83) vs SF (21.82). HKXCY YTD gains are higher at: 53.158 vs. SF (7.541).
HKXCYSFHKXCY / SF
Capitalization70.6B11.5B614%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD53.1587.541705%
P/E Ratio35.8321.82164%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A1.55B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCY vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCY
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7221
SMR RATING
1..100
3512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1830
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SF's Valuation (33) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (54) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCY (72) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (35) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCYSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMIF25.420.49
+1.95%
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
NAC11.380.13
+1.16%
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund
RSSB27.600.24
+0.88%
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
TMFS36.040.09
+0.24%
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
IONL41.51-0.67
-1.60%
GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
+0.67%
FUTU - HKXCY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
TIGR - HKXCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
HKXCF - HKXCY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOP - HKXCY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SF - HKXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-2.71%
EVR - SF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
GS - SF
88%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
RJF - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-3.27%
MS - SF
86%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
JEF - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.26%
More