HKXCY
Price
$52.32
Change
-$0.55 (-1.04%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
52.98B
66 days until earnings call
SF
Price
$95.37
Change
-$1.61 (-1.66%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.95B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCY vs SF

Header iconHKXCY vs SF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCY vs SFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$52.32
Change-$0.55 (-1.04%)
Volume$53.1K
Capitalization52.98B
Stifel Financial
Price$95.37
Change-$1.61 (-1.66%)
Volume$668.37K
Capitalization7.95B
HKXCY vs SF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCY vs. SF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCY is a Hold and SF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCY: $52.32 vs. SF: $95.37)
Brand notoriety: HKXCY and SF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCY: 28% vs. SF: 84%
Market capitalization -- HKXCY: $52.98B vs. SF: $7.95B
HKXCY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. SF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HKXCY and SF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCY.

Price Growth

HKXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while SF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

SF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.41% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($53B) has a higher market cap than SF($7.95B). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than SF: HKXCY (37.74) vs SF (18.06). HKXCY YTD gains are higher at: 41.345 vs. SF (-9.262). SF has less debt than HKXCY: SF (1.18B) vs HKXCY (1.76B). HKXCY has higher revenues than SF: HKXCY (16.4B) vs SF (4.29B).
HKXCYSFHKXCY / SF
Capitalization53B7.95B667%
EBITDA16.2BN/A-
Gain YTD41.345-9.262-446%
P/E Ratio37.7418.06209%
Revenue16.4B4.29B382%
Total Cash265BN/A-
Total Debt1.76B1.18B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCY vs SF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCY
SF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5823
SMR RATING
1..100
3510
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2050
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
13n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCY's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

SF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCY (58) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCY (35) in the null industry. This means that SF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (57) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SF (50) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to SF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCYSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRFNX11.28-0.09
-0.79%
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
PIOKX42.12-0.52
-1.22%
Victory Pioneer R6
HDQVX17.82-0.25
-1.38%
Janus Henderson Responsible Intl DivS
TSMGX15.63-0.23
-1.45%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
NMCCX6.51-0.10
-1.51%
Voya MidCap Opportunities C

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
-1.04%
FUTU - HKXCY
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
TIGR - HKXCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.71%
HKXCF - HKXCY
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
TOP - HKXCY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
SF - HKXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
More

SF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SF
1D Price
Change %
SF100%
-1.66%
GS - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
EVR - SF
87%
Closely correlated
-2.86%
PIPR - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.50%
MS - SF
85%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
RJF - SF
84%
Closely correlated
-2.01%
More