HKXCY
Price
$55.94
Change
+$0.37 (+0.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
70.71B
43 days until earnings call
HYHDF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCY vs HYHDF

Header iconHKXCY vs HYHDF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCY vs HYHDFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$55.94
Change+$0.37 (+0.67%)
Volume$62.74K
Capitalization70.71B
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization11.57M
HKXCY vs HYHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCY vs. HYHDF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCY is a Hold and HYHDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCY: $55.94 vs. HYHDF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: HKXCY and HYHDF are both not notable
HKXCY represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while HYHDF is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCY: 91% vs. HYHDF: 12%
Market capitalization -- HKXCY: $70.71B vs. HYHDF: $11.57M
HKXCY [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $70.71B. HYHDF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $11.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $166.65B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the long-term than HYHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYHDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HKXCY (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -3.22% price change this week, while HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -21.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +12.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.38% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+12.34% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($70.7B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($11.6M). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: HKXCY (36.00) vs HYHDF (2.71). HKXCY YTD gains are higher at: 53.158 vs. HYHDF (24.286). HKXCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. HYHDF (5.16M). HKXCY has more cash in the bank: 282B vs. HYHDF (19.3M). HYHDF has less debt than HKXCY: HYHDF (2.89M) vs HKXCY (873M). HKXCY has higher revenues than HYHDF: HKXCY (20.3B) vs HYHDF (8.4M).
HKXCYHYHDFHKXCY / HYHDF
Capitalization70.7B11.6M609,483%
EBITDA24.5B5.16M474,438%
Gain YTD53.15824.286219%
P/E Ratio36.002.711,329%
Revenue20.3B8.4M241,580%
Total Cash282B19.3M1,461,140%
Total Debt873M2.89M30,208%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCY vs HYHDF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCY
HYHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
3578
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCY's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (68). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (78). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCY (42). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCY (18). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCYHYHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROWKF0.450.05
+12.50%
Renoworks Software, Inc.
JSAIY17.210.56
+3.36%
J Sainsbury plc
TNISF19.00N/A
N/A
Tecnicas Reunidas Sa
EREUF1.75N/A
N/A
EUROPEAN RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE INVT TR
WELUF12.19N/A
N/A
Integrated Wellness Acquisition Corp.

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
+0.67%
FUTU - HKXCY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
TIGR - HKXCY
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.38%
HKXCF - HKXCY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOP - HKXCY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
SF - HKXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
More

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
N/A
JPXGY - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
HKXCF - HYHDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCQEF - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - HYHDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
More