HKXCF
Price
$55.99
Change
+$2.15 (+3.99%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
69.9B
TIGR
Price
$10.16
Change
-$0.40 (-3.79%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.81B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs TIGR

Header iconHKXCF vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$55.99
Change+$2.15 (+3.99%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization69.9B
UP Fintech Holding
Price$10.16
Change-$0.40 (-3.79%)
Volume$3.51M
Capitalization1.81B
HKXCF vs TIGR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. TIGR commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and TIGR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $55.99 vs. TIGR: $10.16)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and TIGR are both not notable
HKXCF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while TIGR is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 86% vs. TIGR: 57%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $69.9B vs. TIGR: $1.81B
HKXCF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $69.9B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.74B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the short-term than TIGR.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.63% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.96% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($69.9B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($1.81B). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: HKXCF (35.76) vs TIGR (15.39). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 57.276 vs. HKXCF (53.280). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.5B vs. TIGR (221M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 282B vs. TIGR (805M). TIGR has less debt than HKXCF: TIGR (175M) vs HKXCF (873M). HKXCF has higher revenues than TIGR: HKXCF (20.3B) vs TIGR (486M).
HKXCFTIGRHKXCF / TIGR
Capitalization69.9B1.81B3,873%
EBITDA24.5B221M11,086%
Gain YTD53.28057.27693%
P/E Ratio35.7615.39232%
Revenue20.3B486M4,177%
Total Cash282B805M35,031%
Total Debt873M175M499%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8687
SMR RATING
1..100
3447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TIGR (77) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as HKXCF (50) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (98) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HKXCF’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVERX15.610.21
+1.36%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl 2
SVUIX40.910.51
+1.26%
NAA SMid Cap Value Institutional
MCPRX28.290.20
+0.71%
MFS Mid Cap Growth R2
ESGMX21.400.13
+0.61%
Mirova Global Megatrends A
ICISX13.65N/A
N/A
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II I

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKXCF and HKXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKXCF and HKXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
+4.00%
HKXCY - HKXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
TIGR - HKXCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
FUTU - HKXCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
LDNXF - HKXCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.98%
HYHDF - HKXCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
-3.79%
FUTU - TIGR
72%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
HKXCY - TIGR
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
HKXCF - TIGR
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.00%
IREN - TIGR
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.57%
BGC - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
More