HKXCF
Price
$51.00
Change
-$3.50 (-6.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
52.98B
LDNXF
Price
$148.30
Change
-$0.30 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
59.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs LDNXF

Header iconHKXCF vs LDNXF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs LDNXFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$51.00
Change-$3.50 (-6.42%)
Volume$2.33K
Capitalization52.98B
London Stock Exchange
Price$148.30
Change-$0.30 (-0.20%)
Volume$1.45K
Capitalization59.89B
HKXCF vs LDNXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LDNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. LDNXF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and LDNXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $51.00 vs. LDNXF: $148.30)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and LDNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 16% vs. LDNXF: 60%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $52.98B vs. LDNXF: $59.89B
HKXCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. LDNXF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $59.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLDNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LDNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than LDNXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LDNXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LDNXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LDNXF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.66% price change this week, while LDNXF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDNXF($59.9B) has a higher market cap than HKXCF($53B). LDNXF has higher P/E ratio than HKXCF: LDNXF (59.17) vs HKXCF (37.88). HKXCF YTD gains are higher at: 39.619 vs. LDNXF (6.913). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. LDNXF (3.38B). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. LDNXF (1.99B). HKXCF has less debt than LDNXF: HKXCF (1.76B) vs LDNXF (8.82B). HKXCF has higher revenues than LDNXF: HKXCF (16.4B) vs LDNXF (7.74B).
HKXCFLDNXFHKXCF / LDNXF
Capitalization53B59.9B88%
EBITDA16.2B3.38B479%
Gain YTD39.6196.913573%
P/E Ratio37.8859.1764%
Revenue16.4B7.74B212%
Total Cash265B1.99B13,317%
Total Debt1.76B8.82B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs LDNXF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
LDNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7149
SMR RATING
1..100
3596
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LDNXF (84). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

LDNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (71). This means that LDNXF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LDNXF (96). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LDNXF (54). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as LDNXF (28). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to LDNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFLDNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LDNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMID34.930.43
+1.25%
Smith-Midland Corp
KALA5.100.05
+0.99%
Kala BIO
MPC176.051.59
+0.91%
MARATHON PETROLEUM Corp
HCI146.761.33
+0.91%
HCI Group
MMS72.06-0.38
-0.52%
MAXIMUS

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKXCF and HKXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKXCF and HKXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-6.42%
HKXCY - HKXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
TIGR - HKXCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
FUTU - HKXCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
LDNXF - HKXCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
HYHDF - HKXCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-19.59%
More

LDNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LDNXF and DBOEY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LDNXF and DBOEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDNXF
1D Price
Change %
LDNXF100%
-0.20%
DBOEY - LDNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
MQBKY - LDNXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
LNSTY - LDNXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
DBOEF - LDNXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
HKXCF - LDNXF
15%
Poorly correlated
-6.42%
More