HKXCF
Price
$54.91
Change
-$1.11 (-1.98%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
70.57B
IGGHY
Price
$15.75
Change
+$0.95 (+6.42%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs IGGHY

Header iconHKXCF vs IGGHY Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs IGGHYBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$54.91
Change-$1.11 (-1.98%)
Volume$495
Capitalization70.57B
IG Group Holdings
Price$15.75
Change+$0.95 (+6.42%)
Volume$575
Capitalization5.29B
HKXCF vs IGGHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGGHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. IGGHY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and IGGHY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $54.91 vs. IGGHY: $15.75)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and IGGHY are both not notable
HKXCF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while IGGHY is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 11% vs. IGGHY: 194%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $70.57B vs. IGGHY: $5.29B
HKXCF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $70.57B. IGGHY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $5.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIGGHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IGGHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGGHY is a better buy in the long-term than HKXCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IGGHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IGGHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IGGHY is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while IGGHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +6.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.43%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.68% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($70.6B) has a higher market cap than IGGHY($5.3B). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than IGGHY: HKXCF (35.17) vs IGGHY (11.15). HKXCF YTD gains are higher at: 50.312 vs. IGGHY (26.382). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.7B vs. IGGHY (601M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 247B vs. IGGHY (1.07B). IGGHY has less debt than HKXCF: IGGHY (568M) vs HKXCF (1.71B). HKXCF has higher revenues than IGGHY: HKXCF (19B) vs IGGHY (949M).
HKXCFIGGHYHKXCF / IGGHY
Capitalization70.6B5.3B1,333%
EBITDA23.7B601M3,943%
Gain YTD50.31226.382191%
P/E Ratio35.1711.15315%
Revenue19B949M2,002%
Total Cash247B1.07B23,041%
Total Debt1.71B568M301%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs IGGHY: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
IGGHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8223
SMR RATING
1..100
3524
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IGGHY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCF (50). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

IGGHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCF (82). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

IGGHY's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (35). This means that IGGHY’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as IGGHY (46). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to IGGHY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IGGHY (54). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IGGHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFIGGHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IGGHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPO216.855.07
+2.39%
Enpro
IDXX640.446.49
+1.02%
IDEXX Laboratories
CCRD27.06-0.21
-0.77%
CoreCard Corp
RVP0.78-0.01
-1.10%
Retractable Technologies
GRPN23.30-1.18
-4.82%
Groupon

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKXCF and HKXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKXCF and HKXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-1.98%
HKXCY - HKXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
TIGR - HKXCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
FUTU - HKXCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
LDNXF - HKXCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
HYHDF - HKXCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IGGHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGGHY and MCO have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGGHY and MCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGGHY
1D Price
Change %
IGGHY100%
+6.42%
MCO - IGGHY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
LNSTY - IGGHY
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
LDNXF - IGGHY
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
JSEJF - IGGHY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCF - IGGHY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More