HKXCF
Price
$51.00
Change
-$3.50 (-6.42%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
52.98B
HYHDF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.03 (-23.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs HYHDF

Header iconHKXCF vs HYHDF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs HYHDFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$51.00
Change-$3.50 (-6.42%)
Volume$2.33K
Capitalization52.98B
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.10
Change-$0.03 (-23.08%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization3.69M
HKXCF vs HYHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. HYHDF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and HYHDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $51.00 vs. HYHDF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and HYHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 16% vs. HYHDF: 60%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $52.98B vs. HYHDF: $3.69M
HKXCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. HYHDF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than HYHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYHDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HYHDF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.66% price change this week, while HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -15.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($53B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($3.69M). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: HKXCF (37.88) vs HYHDF (0.59). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 60.317 vs. HKXCF (39.619). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. HYHDF (-22.02M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. HYHDF (6.21M). HYHDF has less debt than HKXCF: HYHDF (6.6M) vs HKXCF (1.76B). HKXCF has higher revenues than HYHDF: HKXCF (16.4B) vs HYHDF (0).
HKXCFHYHDFHKXCF / HYHDF
Capitalization53B3.69M1,436,314%
EBITDA16.2B-22.02M-73,554%
Gain YTD39.61960.31766%
P/E Ratio37.880.596,411%
Revenue16.4B0-
Total Cash265B6.21M4,267,998%
Total Debt1.76B6.6M26,666%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs HYHDF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
HYHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
3578
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4234
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
289
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (67). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (78). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (42). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (28). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFHYHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARLO17.600.67
+3.96%
Arlo Technologies
OBT27.420.27
+0.99%
Orange County Bancorp Inc
LNC34.77-0.20
-0.57%
Lincoln National Corp
GSK38.18-0.33
-0.86%
GSK plc
RADX3.98-0.08
-2.05%
Radiopharm Theranostics Limited

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKXCF and HKXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKXCF and HKXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-6.42%
HKXCY - HKXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
TIGR - HKXCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
FUTU - HKXCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
LDNXF - HKXCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
HYHDF - HKXCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-19.59%
More

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
-19.59%
JPXGY - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
HKXCF - HYHDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.42%
MCQEF - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
HKXCY - HYHDF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.50%
More