HKXCF
Price
$54.76
Change
-$2.42 (-4.23%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
70.75B
HYHDF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
21.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs HYHDF

Header iconHKXCF vs HYHDF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs HYHDFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$54.76
Change-$2.42 (-4.23%)
Volume$957
Capitalization70.75B
SIXTY SIX CAP
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization21.7M
HKXCF vs HYHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. HYHDF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and HYHDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $54.76 vs. HYHDF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and HYHDF are both not notable
HKXCF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while HYHDF is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 9% vs. HYHDF: 24%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $70.75B vs. HYHDF: $21.7M
HKXCF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $70.75B. HYHDF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $21.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $169.89B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.56B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HYHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than HYHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYHDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HYHDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the short-term than HYHDF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.32% price change this week, while HYHDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.30% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($70.7B) has a higher market cap than HYHDF($21.7M). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than HYHDF: HKXCF (38.48) vs HYHDF (1.22). HYHDF YTD gains are higher at: 122.222 vs. HKXCF (49.907). HKXCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.7B vs. HYHDF (1.25M). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 247B vs. HYHDF (15.9M). HYHDF has less debt than HKXCF: HYHDF (5.94M) vs HKXCF (1.71B). HKXCF has higher revenues than HYHDF: HKXCF (19B) vs HYHDF (8.38M).
HKXCFHYHDFHKXCF / HYHDF
Capitalization70.7B21.7M325,806%
EBITDA23.7B1.25M1,897,518%
Gain YTD49.907122.22241%
P/E Ratio38.481.223,149%
Revenue19B8.38M226,622%
Total Cash247B15.9M1,553,459%
Total Debt1.71B5.94M28,754%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs HYHDF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
HYHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5174
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
3677
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4034
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (70). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as HYHDF (100). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYHDF (77). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (40). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HYHDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (14). This means that HYHDF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFHYHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAY37.450.17
+0.46%
Paymentus Holdings
CNQ29.840.05
+0.17%
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
EQS1.87-0.02
-1.00%
Equus Total Return
SGHT4.20-0.05
-1.18%
Sight Sciences
MRTN11.92-0.22
-1.81%
Marten Transport Ltd

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKXCF and HKXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKXCF and HKXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-4.24%
HKXCY - HKXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
TIGR - HKXCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.13%
FUTU - HKXCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
LDNXF - HKXCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
HYHDF - HKXCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More

HYHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYHDF and JPXGY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYHDF and JPXGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYHDF
1D Price
Change %
HYHDF100%
+2.71%
JPXGY - HYHDF
13%
Poorly correlated
+6.26%
HKXCF - HYHDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
MCQEF - HYHDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
MAUSY - HYHDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - HYHDF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More