Advertisement
HKUOF vs SNIPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKUOF is a Hold and SNIPF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKUOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNIPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HKUOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SNIPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HKUOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNIPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HKUOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- SNIPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HKUOF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNIPF (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was +11.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.69%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-1.49% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| HKUOF | SNIPF | HKUOF / SNIPF | |
| Capitalization | 2.92B | 15.6M | 18,718% |
| EBITDA | 84.5B | 889K | 9,505,062% |
| Gain YTD | -1.674 | -21.176 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.57 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 975B | 24.5M | 3,979,592% |
| Total Cash | 170B | 5.77M | 2,946,785% |
| Total Debt | 141B | 488K | 28,893,443% |
HKUOF | SNIPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNIPF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKUOF (94). This means that SNIPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKUOF’s over the last 12 months.
SNIPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as HKUOF (100). This means that SNIPF’s stock grew similarly to HKUOF’s over the last 12 months.
SNIPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as HKUOF (97). This means that SNIPF’s stock grew similarly to HKUOF’s over the last 12 months.
SNIPF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as HKUOF (73). This means that SNIPF’s stock grew similarly to HKUOF’s over the last 12 months.
SNIPF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HKUOF (10). This means that SNIPF’s stock grew similarly to HKUOF’s over the last 12 months.
| HKUOF | SNIPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 6% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 6% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TGIRX | 33.00 | 0.32 | +0.98% |
| Thornburg International Equity R6 | |||
| BRWVX | 28.10 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R6 | |||
| ECFGX | 24.75 | -0.08 | -0.32% |
| Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C | |||
| CFNFX | 89.79 | -0.35 | -0.39% |
| American Funds Fundamental Invs 529F1 | |||
| PMFJX | 21.39 | -0.13 | -0.60% |
| Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index J | |||
HKUOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HKUOF and WPPGF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKUOF and WPPGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKUOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKUOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WPPGF - HKUOF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CAUUF - HKUOF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IAS - HKUOF | -1% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| INEOF - HKUOF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNIPF - HKUOF | -4% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
More | ||||
SNIPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNIPF and BAOS have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNIPF and BAOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNIPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNIPF | 100% | +2.06% | ||
| BAOS - SNIPF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| SNPW - SNIPF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| INEOF - SNIPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SWAG - SNIPF | 2% Poorly correlated | +5.21% | ||
| CAUUF - SNIPF | -3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||